Russian Separatists Trick Journalists And Mothers Into The Line Of Fire
By
Paul Gregory (Hoover
Institution and University of Houston)
News services throughout the world carried dramatic video of a mortally
wounded Channel One Russian journalist lying on the floor of a minibus as those
around him sought in vain to save his life. Among the bus’s occupants were
women, said to be mothers of the Ukrainian soldiers in the garrison outside of
Donetsk, who had opened fire on the minibus (here's the video).
Thanks to the eyewitness account of a Forbes.ru journalist, we learn
that the Russian separatists deliberately sent reporters and mothers of
soldiers into the line of fire, hoping to gain a propaganda coup from their
deaths or injuries. They succeeded. We remember the shocking first impression,
not the latter fact that the tragedy was orchestrated for propaganda gain. That
Putin and his agents in east Ukraine are prepared to sacrifice their own
reporters and women brings home what Ukraine is up against. Putin will fight to
the end before he lets Ukraine go.
Moscow angrily condemned the attack on its journalist. (For a summary of
Russian complaints, see RT
report in English). According to Russia’s
Foreign Ministry, the death of the Channel One camera man shows that
Ukrainian law enforcement agencies are blocking the truce and are continuing
the brutal persecution of Russian journalists in Ukraine. Russia’s Channel One
vented that “Ukrainian power continues killing journalists in the southeast –
it [Kiev] is not satisfied that it is impossible to hide the actions against
its own people. There [in Kiev] they prefer to deal with the rebels without
witnesses.”
An eyewitness
account of the fatal incident by Forbes.ru reporter, Orkhan Jemal,
shows that the self-proclaimed Peoples Republic of Donetsk deliberately set up
reporters and soldiers’ mothers to be shot at to achieve a propaganda victory.
Jemal’s account has been summarized
in English by Halya Coynash, a Ukrainian civil rights activist and
commentator.
Here is the Forbes.ru account of the events of the night of June 30:
The press service of the self-proclaimed People’s Republic of Donetsk
summoned journalists to assemble at the regional administration building in the
evening. They were met by a press representative, who introduced himself as
“Gyurza.” He explained that they were to go, together with the soldiers’
mothers, to the Ukrainian military unit in the town of Spartak outside of
Donetsk. Gyurza claimed that he had reached an agreement with the
Ukrainian commander that the fifty-odd soldiers there would surrender without a
fight. He would carry out the negotiations himself. The mothers of soldiers
serving there would come out with placards urging their sons to surrender, and
the reporters would get “sensational material.”
In other words, everything has been arranged. There is no danger. We have
done this dozens of times and know what we are doing.
Instead of riding on the minibus arranged for journalists and the mothers,
Jemal opted to travel by taxi, together with colleagues from LifeNews – the
Russian news service implicated in fabrications
of Ukrainian news stories and possible weapons smuggling. They arrived
first, got out of the car, turned off the lights, and waited for the minibus.
The nervous troops inside opened fire on their car as Jemal and the LifeNews
reporters crawled to safety in the pitch dark. They then watched as the
minibus with journalists and mothers arrived. The driver thrust a white scarf
out the window as he drove towards the military unit, which opened fire. The
Russian Channel One reporter and the driver were wounded as they sped away from
the scene. The reporters inside the fleeing minibus recorded the shooting and
the Russian reporter’s final minutes in dramatic footage.
Jemal concludes his account: “There will probably be a whole lot of
statements about the inhuman Kiev fascists who shoot journalists. Although all
who were there, without exception, understand that we were deliberately placed
under fire. It’s not for nothing that they call this a war of information: a
busload of journalists shot at is also a propaganda achievement, no less than a
[Ukrainian] military unit that’s surrendered.”
The outraged Russian news
media appealed to international organization to demand an end to the
persecution of journalists in Ukraine. One such international organization,
Reporters Without Borders, responded by asking why the separatists sent out a
bus with journalists and soldiers’ mothers late at night, whose white flag
could not be seen in the dark by a military unit that had every reason to
suspect an imminent attack.
Jemal’s account does not indicate where “negotiator” Gyurza was during the
gunfire. His claim that everything had already been arranged holds no water.
The Ukrainian troops would scarcely have opened fire on a minibus that carried
their mothers.
Former Putin economics advisor, Andrei Illarionov, warned
in March that Vladimir Putin would not hesitate to kill innocent civilians
for propaganda gain in his war against Ukraine. His minions appear to have done
so in this case. Russian analyst, Yuliya Latynina, also foretold Putin’s New
Kind of War that designates women and children as “an important military
force.” As Putin himself suggested in his March 4 press conference, “Let them
[the Ukrainian forces] try to shoot at their own children.” In an earlier blog post,
I presented evidence that the Easter Sunday massacre of unarmed civilians
manning a road block was the work of Russian special forces. This piece was
attacked furiously by Putin’s trolls, which shows it hit a very sore spot.
Putin’s propagandists must still be celebrating the Channel One reporter’s
death. Their only regret is that one of the mothers was not the victim.
No comments:
Post a Comment