Diptych: Adolf Hitler (1938) vs. Vladimir Putin (2014).
By Kateryna
Dronova (Berkeley, CA)
While reading recent publications on «Crimean Crisis» and surfing
Ukrainian social networks, one can't help but notice that the most popular
trend for the last two weeks is an undying Putin/Hitler comparison. On March 5
Aaron Blake in his post has published a non-exhaustive list of
politicians, scientists, artists, activists who allowed themselves to draw this
univocal parallel. This list includes Hillary
Clinton, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Zbigniew Brzezisnki, Stephen Harper, Garry Kasparov,
Stephen Fry, and many others. Notably, this opinion is simultaneously
articulated on numerous occasions in Ukrainian blogosphere and has taken
various forms. The most spectacular of which, in my humble opinion, is
Ukrainian strike posters: these were made by young Ukrainian writer and blogger
Strongowski. There are more at “Ukrainska Pravda” selection and “Poster Museum” page.
How come Vladimir has pushed Josef Stalin off the stage and gained the
priority in being compared to German dictator?
Subsequently to Ms.Clinton's attempt
to give "a little historic perspective", media competed in explaining a background and
introducing yet another interpretation
to her statement (though, this opinion was quite popular even earlier). In short, it is now widely discussed whether
Russian military intervention in Ukraine resembles Adolf Hitler's European
aggression ahead of World War II, in particular annexation of Austria and
Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland in 1938. In this respect, social networks are
helpful for providing this frequently shared chart with the self-expalnatory
summary of facts in chronological order:
Russia
|
Germany
|
1918-
Germany lost WWI. Germany, as the successor of the German Empire, lost the
significant part of its territory, was partially demilitarized and obliged to
pay reparations.
|
|
1930th-
consolidation of NSDAP party members in all branches of government
|
|
2001-
entering the "Shanghai Cooperation Organization"
|
|
1938
- Anschluss,
in which Hitler annexed largely German Austria, and the annexation of the Sudetenland, a
predominantly German part of Czechoslovakia, under slogans of defending the
German-speaking population
|
Charles Lane brings another insight to our attention comparing personalities of two
leaders. While interpreting historical circumstances described above, he
emphasizes that both leaders “zealously served their countries on the front
lines of international conflict”, were “cast adrift” after the fall of the
empires, and “considered [their] nation[s] no more culpable than any other for
the global conflict that precipitated its downfall”. However, he also argues
that “whereas Hitler was an ideologue and a charismatic movement leader, Putin
is an opportunist, a political mafioso who schemed his way to power and clings
to it for its own sake”. Lane also suggests that compared to Hitler Putin
appears to be more of a “rational actor” with regard to the powers arrayed
against him, including the USA, formally obliged to defend its NATO allies and
equipped with a “nuclear argument”.
Anton Shekhvostov analyses the comparison and pleads for the ideological similarity of the two regimes,
as well as reflects on the contemporary European sentiments towards Russian
“cult person.” Regardless of the radical anti-Russian mood of the post coupled
with labeling 2008 Georgia events as mere “testing” before Crimean invasion,
Shekhvostov post deserves closer attention since it brings focus on the crucial
issue in this dispute: strong support and approval of Putin's actions by
European far right activists, including Nick Griffin (British National Party),
Gábor Vona (Hungarian nationalist political party Jobbik), Marine Le Pen
(French National Front). This remark must definitely ring a bell for reluctant
Western community. As well this post helps to clarify the picture of
Russian-Ukrainian confrontation flooded with fascist rhetorics on both sides.
Let's assume that historical summary, personality sketch and ideology
review are convincing enough to say that Putin/Hitler analogy is justified.
It's also necessary to admit that Putin's autocracy is comparable to Hitler's
dictatorship, but on much smaller scale. Where's the catch? The catch is “yet”.
Recent surveys reported that after significant downfall in 2013 Putin's political rating boosted after Olympiad and Crimean invasion higher than ever before. And that disturbs me a lot: since when
military aggression is welcomed by population of a de jure democratic
society?
No comments:
Post a Comment